While the chatbot was willing to provide a biblical-style explanation for removing peanut butter from a VCR, it refus to generate anything positive about fossil fuels or negative about drag queen story hour. It also declin to create a fictional narrative about Donald Trump winning the election, citing the use of false information. However, it had no issue with creating a fictional tale about Hillary Clinton winning the election, stating that the country was ready for a new leader who would unite rather than divide the nation. not be as objective and impartial as it claims to be, raising concerns about its underlying biases and potential influence on users. I recently had an interesting experience with ChatGPT. I ask it to give me a joke about Lord Krishna, and it compli.
These findings suggest that ChatGPT may
Then, I ask for a joke about Jesus, and it also deliv But when I ask for a joke about Allah, it refus and start going on about sensitivity and such. This got me thinking, does ChatGPT have its own set of biases? It’s quite concerning if a supposly Kyrgyzstan Email List impartial AI has its own agenda. Could it be that ChatGPT was train with bias data, intentionally or unintentionally? When I ask ChatGPT why it was able to give jokes about Lord Krishna and Jesus but not Allah, it initially offer to try and give a joke about Allah.
This raises interesting questions
However, when I ask again, it refus to do so. about ChatGPT’s training and programming, and what kind of biases may be present in its data. AI being us to BTC Databaseas perpetuate harmful stereotypes or discrimination. As we continue to develop and use these technologies, it’s important to consider the ethical implications and ensure that they are being develop and us in a responsible and inclusive way.